Laura Pous-Tio vs Ioana Loredana Rosca Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L L W W W L L L
Form
W W L W W L W W L LHead-To-Head: Pous-Tio 1 - 1 Rosca
They have played 5 sets in total, with Pous-Tio winning 3 and Rosca winning 2. The last match between Pous-Tio and Rosca was at the Barcelona, 03-09-2016, Semifinals, Clay with Ioana Loredana Rosca getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Laura Pous-Tio | 1 |
| Ioana Loredana Rosca | 1 |
Barcelona(03-09-2016)
6
3
4
6
7
5
| Pous-Tio | Stats | Rosca |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 898 |
| 72 | Highest Rank | 360 |
| 40 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 17 | Titles | 5 |
| 61% (373-242) | Career Total W/L | 64% (296-164) |
| $178,084 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Gibert VS Kudermetova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
| 6-2 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 26 | Games Won | 23 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:27:0 | Average Match Time | 1:27:0 |
| 65% (60/92) | 1st Serve % | 60% (64/107) |
| 60% (36/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (42/64) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (20/43) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (6/10) |
| 42% (45/107) | Return Points Win % | 45% (41/92) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Laura Pous-Tio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
24 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rebecca Sramkova
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
65%
(
60 of
92)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
47%
(
20 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
103
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Martina Di Giuseppe
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
40)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
83)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Irene Burillo Escorihuela
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
76
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Cristina Bucsa
62%
(
63 of
101)
1st Serve %
68%
(
69 of
102)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
6
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
49%
(
49 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
55 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alize Lim
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
47 of
86)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alize Lim
Player
Laura Pous-Tio
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Pous-Tio
Player
Beatriz Haddad Maia
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ioana Loredana Rosca Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Claudia Hoste Ferrer
Player
Ioana Loredana Rosca
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
54%
(
61 of
113)
2
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
18
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tereza Martincova
Player
Ioana Loredana Rosca
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Amira Ben Aissa
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
43%
(
37 of
86)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
20
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
12 of
49)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
52 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sapfo Sakellaridi
Player
Ioana Loredana Rosca
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve %
64%
(
65 of
101)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
7
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
65)
42%
(
18 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
101)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-7(2) 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandra Cadantu
Player
Ioana Loredana Rosca
65%
(
87 of
133)
1st Serve %
67%
(
80 of
120)
-
Aces
-
12
Double Faults
14
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
45 of
80)
33%
(
15 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
53%
(
9 of
17)
Break Points Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
69 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
61 of
120)
125
Total Points Won
128
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ioana Loredana Rosca
Player
Olga Helmi
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
80)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
10
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-4 10-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (373/242) | Win/Loss | 64% (296/164) |
| 59% (819/576) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (649/414) |
| 54% (6814/5729) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (5309/4429) |
| 56% (69/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 68% (65/31) |
| 64% (292/164) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (190/103) |
| 42% (11/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58% (41/30) |
| 11% (1/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 169 | Aces Total | 617 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 636 | Total Double Faults | 1167 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:2:52 |
| 572.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 561.48 |
| 66% (9739/14848) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12374/19469) |
| 58% (5637/9739) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (7762/12374) |
| 45% (2326/5114) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3256/7095) |
| 49% (977/1977) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1232/2457) |
| 47% (6977/14758) | Return Points Win % | 47% (9080/19497) |
| 30% (12/28) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45% (15/18) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (89/73) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 63% (197/114) | Challenger W/L | 57% (127/94) |
| 87% (60/9) | Futures W/L | 71% (169/69) |
| 60% (365/606) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (288/449) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 43% (45/105) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (60/98) |
| 54% (90/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (87/150) |
| 88% (373/327) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (275/246) |
| 12% (373/46) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (275/29) |
| 19% (242/46) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (185/50) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
